Islam, Democracy, and Digital Religious Influencers: Reconfiguring Political Authority in Contemporary Indonesia
Keywords:
Digital Religion, Political Communication, Democracy, Religious Influencers, IndonesiaAbstract
Digital media has transformed the relationship between religion, politics, and public authority by enabling religious influencers to shape political discourse beyond traditional institutional structures. In Indonesia, the world's largest Muslim-majority democracy, digital religious influencers have become increasingly influential during elections, policy debates, and discussions concerning national identity. However, existing literature has primarily focused on conventional religious organizations, leaving the political significance of digital religious authority insufficiently explored. This study examines how digital religious influencers reshape political authority, democratic participation, and public opinion in contemporary Indonesia. Drawing upon theories of digital religion, political communication, and democratic governance, the research employs qualitative content analysis of social media platforms, complemented by interviews with religious scholars, digital content creators, policymakers, and civil society organizations. The findings suggest that digital platforms decentralize religious authority by enabling new actors to mobilize political support, frame policy debates, and influence electoral preferences independently of established institutions. At the same time, algorithm-driven visibility and online polarization create new governance challenges related to misinformation, identity politics, and democratic deliberation. The article argues that Indonesia represents an important case for understanding how digitalization transforms religious authority within democratic systems across the Global South. The study contributes to comparative scholarship by proposing a conceptual framework linking digital religious authority, political legitimacy, and democratic resilience. It concludes that effective democratic governance increasingly requires policies that promote digital literacy, transparent platform governance, and inclusive civic engagement while safeguarding religious freedom and democratic pluralism.
References
Barton, Greg, Ihsan Yilmaz, and Nicholas Morieson. 2021. “Authoritarianism, Democracy, and the Religious Politics of Indonesia.” Religions 12 (11): 956.
Barton, Greg. 2005. Jemaah Islamiyah: Radical Islamism in Indonesia. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexandra Segerberg. 2013. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bunt, Gary R. 2018. Hashtag Islam: How Cyber-Islamic Environments Are Transforming Religious Authority. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Bush, Robin. 2009. Nahdlatul Ulama and the Struggle for Power within Islam and Politics in Indonesia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Campbell, Heidi A. 2010. When Religion Meets New Media. London: Routledge.
Castells, Manuel. 2013. Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chadwick, Andrew. 2017. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Couldry, Nick, and Andreas Hepp. 2017. The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.
Evolvi, Giulia. 2021. “Religion and the Internet: Digital Religion, (Hyper)Mediated Spaces, and Materiality.” Zeitschrift für Religion, Gesellschaft und Politik 5: 1–16.
Fealy, Greg, and Sally White, eds. 2008. Expressing Islam: Religious Life and Politics in Indonesia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Gillespie, Tarleton. 2014. “The Relevance of Algorithms.” In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, edited by Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo J. Boczkowski, and Kirsten A. Foot, 167–194. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hefner, Robert W. 2000. Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hoover, Stewart M. 2016. The Media and Religious Authority. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Kaye, David. 2019. Speech Police: The Global Struggle to Govern the Internet. New York: Columbia Global Reports.
Power, Thomas, and Eve Warburton, eds. 2020. Democracy in Indonesia: From Stagnation to Regression? Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
Sunstein, Cass R. 2018. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tajfel, Henri, and John C. Turner. 1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by Stephen Worchel and William G. Austin, 7–24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nadia Kirana Puspitasari, Muhammad Abdullah Mhd Ibrahim, Bambang Narendra Putra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain full copyright ownership of their works without restriction. The views and opinions expressed in articles published in this journal are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal, its editors, publishers, or the authors’ affiliated institutions. All content published in this journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).






