Indonesia’s IKN Nusantara Project: Political Legitimacy, State Capacity, and Capital Relocation in Comparative Perspective

Authors

  • Vania Citra Permatasari Universitas Islam Bandung

Keywords:

Nusantara, Capital Relocation, State Capacity, Political Legitimacy, Comparative Politics

Abstract

Indonesia's decision to relocate its national capital from Jakarta to Nusantara represents one of the most ambitious state-building projects undertaken in the twenty-first century. Beyond its developmental objectives, the project raises important questions regarding political legitimacy, governance capacity, institutional continuity, and national identity. Existing literature has primarily examined the economic and urban planning dimensions of capital relocation, leaving its political implications underexplored. This article investigates how the Nusantara project reflects Indonesia's broader political transformation by analyzing the relationship between state capacity, political legitimacy, and administrative reform. Using a comparative qualitative approach, the study examines Indonesia alongside previous capital relocation experiences in Brazil, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, and Malaysia. Data are collected through policy document analysis, elite interviews, and comparative institutional analysis. The study argues that successful capital relocation depends not only on infrastructure development but also on sustained political legitimacy, bureaucratic effectiveness, stakeholder participation, and long-term institutional commitment. Preliminary findings suggest that while Nusantara provides opportunities to modernize governance and reduce regional inequality, significant challenges remain concerning democratic accountability, environmental governance, fiscal sustainability, and policy continuity across political administrations. The article develops a comparative analytical framework explaining how capital relocation functions as a political transformation strategy rather than merely an urban development initiative. By integrating comparative politics with public administration, this study contributes to broader discussions on state-building, governance innovation, and institutional resilience in emerging democracies. The findings also provide practical lessons for countries considering large-scale administrative relocation as part of national transformation agendas.

References

Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

Bulkeley, Harriet, and Michele M. Betsill. 2005. Cities and Climate Change: Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental Governance. London: Routledge.

Campbell, Scott. 2003. “Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities? Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development.” Journal of the American Planning Association 62 (3): 296–312.

Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2014. “What You Should Know About Megaprojects and Why: An Overview.” Project Management Journal 45 (2): 6–19.

Fukuyama, Francis. 2013. “What Is Governance?” Governance 26 (3): 347–368.

Fung, Archon. 2006. “Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance.” Public Administration Review 66 (Special Issue): 66–75.

Holston, James. 1989. The Modernist City: An Anthropological Critique of Brasília. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Johnson, Chalmers. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.

Mann, Michael. 1984. “The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results.” European Journal of Sociology 25 (2): 185–213.

North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rossman, Vadim. 2018. Capital Cities: Varieties and Patterns of Development and Relocation. London: Routledge.

Schatz, Edward. 2004. “What Capital Cities Say about State and Nation Building.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 9 (4): 111–140.

Suchman, Mark C. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571–610.

Vale, Lawrence J. 2008. Architecture, Power, and National Identity. London: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Permatasari, V. C. (2025). Indonesia’s IKN Nusantara Project: Political Legitimacy, State Capacity, and Capital Relocation in Comparative Perspective. Indonesian Political Transformation, 1(2), 309–336. Retrieved from https://journals.arteslibres.org/index.php/politics/article/view/43