Beyond Symbolic Recognition: Constitutional Reform for Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Indonesia’s Plural Democracy
Keywords:
Indigenous Peoples, Constitutional Reform, Indonesia, Legal Pluralism, Democratic ParticipationAbstract
This research examines the limits of Indonesia’s constitutional recognition of indigenous peoples and proposes a reform agenda to move beyond symbolic acknowledgment toward substantive constitutional guarantees. The study is motivated by the enduring gap between Article 18B(2) of the 1945 Constitution, which conditionally recognizes “masyarakat hukum adat,” and the lived reality of indigenous communities who continue to experience dispossession, marginalization, and exclusion from decision-making processes. The objective is to assess why recognition remains symbolic and how constitutional reform can ensure enforceable rights consistent with democratic pluralism and global normative standards. Employing a normative legal research method, the study combines statutory, doctrinal, and jurisprudential analysis with comparative constitutional approaches and conceptual frameworks of constitutionalism, multicultural citizenship, and recognition theory. It draws upon global experiences, particularly from Latin America, Canada, and New Zealand, where constitutional reforms have embedded indigenous rights as substantive guarantees through plurinational frameworks, fiduciary obligations, and institutionalized legal pluralism. The results demonstrate that Indonesia’s recognition remains conditional, fragmented, and weakly institutionalized, rendering it ineffective in protecting indigenous peoples’ rights. In contrast, comparative models illustrate that recognition must be unconditional, operationalized through independent institutions, and grounded in legal pluralism. The findings suggest that sustainable reform in Indonesia requires rearticulating constitutional language, establishing an independent commission on indigenous rights, strengthening judicial enforcement, integrating indigenous legal systems, and linking recognition to environmental stewardship and democratic participation. Ultimately, this research contributes to global debates on indigenous constitutionalism by offering a prescriptive model for reform that positions Indonesia to embody its constitutional motto of “unity in diversity” in both principle and practice.
References
Arizona, Y., and Cahyadi, E. R. (2015). The recognition of adat community rights in Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, 1(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v1i1.1307
Bedner, A., and Arizona, Y. (2019). Adat in Indonesian land law: A promise for the future or a dead end? The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 20(5), 416–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670246
Borrows, J. (2017). Earth-bound: Indigenous resurgence and environmental reconciliation. University of Toronto Law Journal, 68(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.2016-0048
Butt, S. (2018). The Constitutional Court and legal pluralism in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 13(2), 239–266. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2018.13
Butt, S., and Lindsey, T. (2012). The Constitution of Indonesia: A contextual analysis. Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472565202
Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.5840/newleftreview200003
Hadiz, V. R. (2010). Localising power in post-authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asian perspective. Critical Asian Studies, 42(2), 255–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672711003711847
Hirschl, R. (2004). Towards juristocracy: The origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674038675
Joseph, P. A. (2011). Constitutional and administrative law in New Zealand (4th ed.). Thomson Reuters. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2846851
Larson, A. M., Barry, D., and Dahal, G. R. (2010). New rights for forest-based communities? Understanding processes of forest tenure reform. International Forestry Review, 12(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.12.1.78
Lev, D. S. (1972). Legal evolution and political authority in Indonesia: Selected essays. Martinus Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004486393
Lucas, A., and Warren, C. (2013). Land for the people: The state and agrarian conflict in Indonesia. Journal of Agrarian Change, 13(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2012.00349.x
Postero, N. (2017). The Indigenous state: Race, politics, and performance in Plurinational Bolivia. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520294035.001.0001
Safitri, M. A. (2015). The constitutional court and indigenous peoples’ rights in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Social Policy, 24(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2697678
Tully, J. (2000). The struggles of indigenous peoples for and of freedom. In D. Ivison, P. Patton, and W. Sanders (Eds.), Political theory and the rights of indigenous peoples (pp. 36–59). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612589.004
United Nations. (2008). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/6d7d6f23-en
Van Cott, D. L. (2000). The friendly liquidation of the past: The politics of diversity in Latin America. University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hjp7d
Walsh, C. (2010). Development as buen vivir: Institutional arrangements and (de)colonial entanglements. Development, 53(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2009.93
Yashar, D. J. (2005). Contesting citizenship in Latin America: The rise of indigenous movements and the postliberal challenge. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790966
